Abstract :
Listening and speaking are central to communicative competence but remain
marginal in many tertiary English assessments in Bangladesh, which continue
to privilege written skills and discrete linguistic knowledge. This qualitative
documentary study combines a scoping review of empirical research with
analysis of policy and test documents to identify gaps in oral-skills
assessment, synthesize validity threats, and develop a context-responsive
framework for standardization. The synthesis identifies four interrelated
constraints: weakly shared proficiency standards, limited assessment literacy
and rater preparation, narrow task and scoring practices, and resource and
governance limitations. Drawing on contemporary validity theory, the
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, and design principles
from IELTS, TOEFL iBT, and PTE Academic, the paper proposes a six-stage
pathway: construct definition; test specifications; task and rubric design;
piloting and analysis; standard setting and reporting; and implementation with
continuing quality assurance. The framework emphasizes national
coordination, transparent validity arguments, localized communicative
demands, rater calibration, moderation, audit trails, and scalable technology
supported administration. It offers a practical basis for improving the fairness,
reliability, comparability, and educational value of listening and speaking
assessment in Bangladeshi higher education.
Keywords: Bangladesh; Listening assessment; Speaking assessment;
Standardization; Validity
Development and Standardization of Testing Systems for English Listening and Speaking: A Framework for Bangladeshi Higher Education - Md. Niaz Alamgir
Sep 12, 2026